You're casually implying that the tradeoff for the more affordable rent in Chicago is a greater likelihood of being the victim of gun violence. While it is a ma

You're casually implying that the tradeoff for the more affordable rent in Chicago is a greater likelihood of being the victim of gun violence. While it is a major problem, that's not the nature of gun violence here. It is highly localized to communities below the poverty level. If you're willing to casually and irresponsibly reduce the Chicago gun violence issue to a flip claim like this, then I have little faith in your ability to faithfully summarize the taxation situation (which seems to be a correct deduction based on the holes everyone is pointing out here.)