4 ms·
Doing all the rendering on the server side is certainly an interesting approach - however, I wonder if the speed comparison will be as favourable once that serv
by ashleytowers 17y ago
Doing all the rendering on the server side is certainly an interesting approach - however, I wonder if the speed comparison will be as favourable once that server is doing the rendering for millions of users!
- IgorPartola 17y agoYes, but that's Opera's problem. I wonder though, if they fall back on using WebKit/other local HTML rendering engine if their servers go down.
- glymor 17y agoFrom 2008: Opera Mini has become the world's most popular mobile browser. Since its worldwide launch in 2006, more than 44 million people have downloaded and used Opera Mini. More than 11.9 million people used Opera Mini in March 2008. I think they can handle the load.
- axod 17y agoThe privacy issue is probably bigger. I don't really want every page I browse to be going through their proxies.
- glymor 17y agoYour pages are already going through an ISP proxy. And that ISP is also retaining your web activity for at least government use.
- ErrantX 17y agoAdding another proxy is adding another "line of attack" though. Also where are the Opera servers located (and Opera as an entity etc.)? could be that it provides another country the opportunity to subpoena your records from them etc.
- glymor 17y agoInterestingly you aren't adding another line as communication with the Opera proxy servers is encrypted. Opera is Norwegian. They say they don't store per user data. http://www.opera.com/mobile/help/faq/#privacy http://www.opera.com/mobile/help/faq/#privacy
- ErrantX 17y agoYes just reading that; seems pretty sound/safe then.
- ErrantX 17y agoInteresting privacy concerns as well perhaps; I can imagine a few people would prefer not to use it because of that. My privacy has never really worried me yet but this makes me stop and think for a second (ultimately I think I'll be fine with it, but it needs considering)
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]