5 ms·
Sure: it's ruled by money or social/technical standing rather than votes. It's run by a bunch of Ayn Rand-ian social darwinists who believe morality can be defi
by matt4077 10y ago
Sure: it's ruled by money or social/technical standing rather than votes. It's run by a bunch of Ayn Rand-ian social darwinists who believe morality can be defined in absolute, 'dispassionate' truths. Oh, and they're now playing the game they hate so much and know so little about.
- pron 10y agoBelieving a group of people can interact without politics is like believing bodies with large masses can interact without gravity; you can believe it, but if you do you really have no idea what gravity -- or politics -- is. As a result, the difference between those who do politics and those who don't, is that those who don't are just destined to do it badly.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- aminok 10y agoThat is an extremely rude/ungenerous blanket characterization of proponents of cryptocurrency. I guess I shouldn't be surprised given your support for authoritarianism.
- f3llowtraveler 10y agoIf aggression is normally used by murderers, robbers, and tyrants, and that is normally "not okay" -- do you believe there are cases where it IS okay, as long as we voted on it first?