3 ms·

It's not really geospatial; you just have multidimentional indices and an intersect operation. I'm not dissing you, indices like that can be extremely useful an

It's not really geospatial; you just have multidimentional indices and an intersect operation. I'm not dissing you, indices like that can be extremely useful and tricky to implement! That said, why only 4D? 5D is very useful, but no one seems to support it :( (x,y,z,time,value)

tidwall 10y ago
Thank you for the feedback. I like the idea of lifting the cap for number of dimensions. I hardcoded a limit of 4 to handle the standard XYZM, but the implementation could technically handle around 20.
tidwall 10y ago
FYI, I just added support for up to 20 dimensions.