12 ms·
>I have no idea how $55M in economic harm was reached either. >Bollea's net worth, at it's peak, was $25M It would include potential losses as well. His net wo
by pervycreeper 10y ago
>I have no idea how $55M in economic harm was reached either.
>Bollea's net worth, at it's peak, was $25M
It would include potential losses as well. His net worth is irrelevant.
- FireBeyond 10y agoRight, again - his career income likely never hit $55M. Even at the peak of his career it would only have been in the <$5M range (one of the Wrestlemania events that he headlined listed his salary for the event at $150K - and there certainly weren't events like that on a monthly basis, so even factoring in endorsements and royalties)... So in retirement, no longer a public figure, aged 62, I have no idea how he can credibly argue he potentially lost $55M in income because of this. That he somehow "potentially" had $4M a year until his death (based on median age of death) of endorsements go up in smoke strains credibility. That seems to me to be some definite creative accounting that might be appealed.