3 ms·
On the other hand, oil boom towns don't _move_. Anecdotally, a lot of people I know are leaving SF. I imagine the next 20-30 years will look like any other ind
by eldavido 10y ago
On the other hand, oil boom towns don't _move_.
Anecdotally, a lot of people I know are leaving SF. I imagine the next 20-30 years will look like any other industry, where a clear center emerged, but then it diffused outward into the broader economy as more and more industries assimilated the new tech.
Now, you could make the argument that SF's core competence isn't so much a technology as the process of innovation itself, but I'm not sure that's the argument you're making. And I don't see any reason why a cheaper place with a lot of smart people and money (to reference pg) couldn't be the next SV, like say, Pittsburgh, or Seattle. Though I guess the social network, which is really what holds this entire place together, does have some staying power...maybe finance is the best example to prove your point?
- orky56 10y agoWe have yet to see a new SV emerge in another city. The capital from VCs is still here. Unless something drastic changes, SV will remain firmly planted as the world's tech hub.
- uola 10y agoBy definition those leaving SF are those who didn't "make it". The whole point of being a center that you have the most power over something that people need, controlling access to markets. It's already very apparent for successful startups from outside SV that has to sell through app stores etc.