3 ms·
Good opsec involves multiple layers of security. There's a fun talk at defcon next month on extending wifi range to avoid detection along with signal 'hiding' v
by mmaunder 10y ago
Good opsec involves multiple layers of security. There's a fun talk at defcon next month on extending wifi range to avoid detection along with signal 'hiding' via SDR:
https://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-23/dc-23-speakers.html#Graham https://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-23/dc-23-speakers.html#Gr...
- ayyn0n0n0 10y agoI will so be there!
- Relys 10y agoSame! =D
- _asummers 10y agoThere's another good talk on more general opsec from Defcon a few years ago called "Don't fuck it up". https://youtube.com/watch?v=J1q4Ir2J8P8 https://youtube.com/watch?v=J1q4Ir2J8P8
- rev_bird 10y agoThis is great, thanks for linking it. I'm really interested in this kind of stuff, but it's so hard to find resources on it. Lots of people on Twitter making fun of mistakes people make, not a lot of folks giving advice.
- j_s 10y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6521145 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6521145 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6521517 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6521517 These discussions are definitely post-mortem analysis but there is also discussion on another OpSec presentation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XaYdCdwiWU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XaYdCdwiWU
- blastrat 10y agogood opsec also involves logging access to the internet and seeing who sent bomb threats... oh wait, whose side am I on?
- zaqwsxcde 10y agoIn asymmetric warfare, being the little guy tends to be the greater challenge, and carries harsh, personally felt consequences. Protecting livestock, so they can be fleeced by their proper owner, on the otherhand, doesn't imbue the same sort of charisma upon the good shepherd.