3 ms·
It might be a better idea to first train computers to define criminality objectively, because most people cannot.
by phazelift 10y ago
It might be a better idea to first train computers to define criminality objectively, because most people cannot.
- jobigoud 10y ago> most people cannot So why do we hold computers to higher standards than humans? Either it's OK to not being able to define criminality objectively and in that case algorithms shouldn't be disqualified for this very reason, or it's not OK, but in that case humans should not be allowed to do the job either.
- phazelift 10y agoConvicting people for criminal behaviour based on a subjective definition of it, is what we already do wrong. Way too many innocent people end up being punished or killed, which I expect to be (objectively) a criminal act in itself. So, I thought we better first have a tool that solves that, instead of a tool that amplifies it.