I see statistics sometimes edges near astrological conclusions. Because sometimes there are many assumptions being made to simplify those equations. Machine lea

I see statistics sometimes edges near astrological conclusions. Because sometimes there are many assumptions being made to simplify those equations. Machine learning just amplifies that assumptive behavior unless you have all the possible test-train-data. Predictions from astrology are just probabilistic - lets say the heavenly object positions are metadata. But then people started treating the results as absolute. Now you know why people dislike astrology. Its not okay to assign risk-score because humans tend to show bias given a quantifiable number. And thats just plain bad.