4 ms·
While I agree that a genuinely static site should be written as such, I'm not writing websites that were possible in 1991, and I don't see why I should have to,
by WalterSear 10y ago
While I agree that a genuinely static site should be written as such, I'm not writing websites that were possible in 1991, and I don't see why I should have to, to get simplicity and productivity: we've come a long way since then.
So, I did a little bit of work to simplify my set up(s) and then to make it useful to others.
- vectorpush 10y agoI'm not making a normative claim, my only point was that the same technology that worked 20 years ago still works today and it's the developer's fault if they don't like the tools they've chosen to use.
- WalterSear 10y agoWell sure, but while I agree that the length and breadth of the toolchain has become stupidly long, the demands of today aren't the demands of yesterday. Take my VR boilerplate, for an extreme example: what are you supposed to use instead, VRML? :)