4 ms·
Right, so long as we can agree that science is not limited to the scientific method. Science should be well defined, but not limited to arbitrary confines.
by James001 10y ago
Right, so long as we can agree that science is not limited to the scientific method. Science should be well defined, but not limited to arbitrary confines.
- tagrun 10y agoScience is well defined. Oh, so when science is defined in the way Popper defines it, it is "arbitrary confines", but when it is defined in a way to legitimize cargo cult science, it is "well defined".
- James001 10y agoArbitrary confines of science is when you limit science to the scientific method. Well-defined science is frankly an insult to science
- tagrun 10y ago> Science should be well defined, but not limited to arbitrary confines. > Well-defined science is frankly an insult to science. Spoken like a true pseudoscientist. Yes, it should be an insult, right? How dare they can expect a scientist to use scientific method for all their results? I mean, it sounds totally crazy, insulting! And more importantly, how are we gonna publish papers or get grants then?
- James001 10y agoStrawmen for days! Just answer me this: Do you believe that the science is purely limited to the scientific method? Just riddle me that and I'll be content. Just keep in mind that you'll be outing yourself as scientifically illiterate.