4 ms·
It seems like we went through this in the 90s with wmv/quicktime/etc. I can't recall why it failed & I'm not sure why it should be better this time around.
by Herring 17y ago
It seems like we went through this in the 90s with wmv/quicktime/etc. I can't recall why it failed & I'm not sure why it should be better this time around.
- GHFigs 17y agoI'm not sure why it should be better this time around. Because today instead of WMV/QuickTime/etc. we have H.264/H.264/Flash (which streams H.264).
- kinetik 17y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_services#Streaming_Video_Technical_Information http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_services#St... I see a lot of VP6 and Sorenson listed there. What we really have today is Flash/Flash/Flash. I'm curious about how much VC-1 use there is in the wild in the large Microsoft/Silverlight streaming video installations.
- blasdel 17y agoBecause there's a single, vendor-neutral, scriptable, unbranded API: <video>