Trump had 10% more votes than the next, but there has been a 9% jump in population since the last open election primary cycle. Using absolute numbers is pretty

Trump had 10% more votes than the next, but there has been a 9% jump in population since the last open election primary cycle. Using absolute numbers is pretty disingenuous. Additionally, the record number of competitors all split the vote against him, leading to an early point where his competitors had -- mathematically -- a very difficult uphill battle. I disagree with you that he has 'wide appeal'. I think he holds zealous appeal among the demagogic and ideological crowd, but I vehemently disagree that he has wide appeal.