5 ms·
Being a person who worked to attain an English degree, I like to think I take the meaning of words with a bit of seriousness that might otherwise be considered
by 6stringmerc 10y ago
Being a person who worked to attain an English degree, I like to think I take the meaning of words with a bit of seriousness that might otherwise be considered going overboard. It's natural to be a critic, and, in turn, be open minded to other people's thoughts, positions, and logic.
What the linked article describes, in linguistic terms, is not harassment. At least not without examples. Harassment is a specific type of human interaction - it's negative, very much so. While there may have been actual harassment of the young author, what was quoted is not a description of harassment.
In plain English, the quote says "I received contacts by people I'm not comfortable being in contact with" and that is, to me, a worthwhile concern to have as a young person engaging in the online realm. Be it social, professional, or otherwise. When I had a dating profile that said "Not interested in under XX age or if you have children" and I got contacted by people who were in one of those categories, that's not really harassment - it could've potentially gotten to that point if I had responded or said some kind of derogatory comment - but it's a social interaction.
Writing online or in any public forum is a form of attention seeking. The internet is, after all, a communications platform at its root. However, this article frames unsolicited contact on open internet platforms as harassment, and that is not fair to the English language.
I'm not clamoring for specifics, nor disputing that the interaction(s) may have been uncomfortable. If there was legitimate harassment, that's a valid point and should not be cheapened, and an example, or "comments of a ____ nature" would simply be helpful. I've had my fair share in real life and online. What I am a stickler about is using loaded words inappropriately, because it does a disservice to everyone involved: It misleads readers and it brings the author's motive for such word selection into question. It hurts an otherwise constructive dialog.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- mgleason_3 10y agoExactly. What is clear is that the young person did not want the attention. So for Dinah Davis to write another article grinding her axe seems rather insensitive. And then to jump to "I am beyond angry and disgusted that this has happened."?!? Based on what?!? Could it be that her parents saw the posts and asked their daughter to put a stop to it? Would you still be "angry and disgusted"? Maybe she's from a culture where its not OK? Or, maybe she just didn't feel comfortable with it and very politely asked to delete it. And instead it was turned into something more.
- DinahDavis 10y agoI did consider that and thought about whether or not I should post. I knew that posting would bring more attention to it, but I also felt that by not posting I was allowing things like this to continue and that is not ok. I felt there was value in standing up for someone who decided to write for our publication, and was approached in an unwanted way. At least this way there are thousands more people that are aware that situations like this happen.In the future, we will try to protect our young posters against this by anonymizing their content.
- 6stringmerc 10y agoThat last sentence is a really good, solution-oriented and reasonable approach. In reflecting on this post-post I recalled how ZeroHedge would use a 'default' name (Tyler Durden) for posts. If one could be used for "Voice From A Young Person" or something to that extent, I think that can be a good outlet and ring-fencing of personal information. Good luck!