4 ms·
> If successful this could lead reduction in developers needed in companies that use say AWS lambda. How so ? to me it makes development even more complicated,
by spriggan3 10y ago
> If successful this could lead reduction in developers needed in companies that use say AWS lambda.
How so ? to me it makes development even more complicated, cheaper relative to hosting fees maybe, but simpler ? I don't think so. What if I want to use language XYZ not supported by lambda ?
- buckbova 10y agoYou can't. Isn't everyone using the same language simple? Convenient? Maybe not.
- nawitus 10y ago> cheaper relative to hosting fees maybe Currently serverless is more expensive in the average case from what I gather, mainly since it's new and there's little competition.
- taurath 10y agoIf avg case is that you stay within an average load for long periods of time, then it'll likely be more expensive (given a certain floor of actual load - for in-dev apps its dirt cheap - you won't have many servers running doing nothing.
- rainhacker 10y ago> What if I want to use language XYZ not supported by lambda ? Such problems can apply to any ready made solution. In general, a vendor product may or may not suffice custom needs and a user is free to build one from scratch. Abstraction of major pain points that fits a wide variety of user needs, if handled properly, can pave the way for a competitive solution.