3 ms·
Actually it should be a simple as expiring whatever API key the jets use to communicate back to the US-based control servers. So when it POSTs to a StartEngine
by cloakandswagger 10y ago
Actually it should be a simple as expiring whatever API key the jets use to communicate back to the US-based control servers. So when it POSTs to a StartEngine endpoint or whatever, it wouldn't start.
- dsfyu404ed 10y agoYou're joking, right?
- goodplay 10y agoLol. No government would buy unreliable weapons.
- jsprogrammer 10y agoNo government could guarantee the reliability of purchased weapons. It is already known and been demonstrated that sabotaged arms will be bought.
- DonHopkins 10y agoWhat if they came with an Enhanced PROMIS Contract that guaranteed their reliability and lack of back doors and trojan horses? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inslaw https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inslaw
- michaelmrose 10y agoIf web developers ran wars the world would be a safer place.
- patates 10y agoApart from war machines communicating through HTTP, I can't help but giggle to the thought of such a dialog: - I repeat, the enemy seems to be not responsive. - What, you already killed them? - No we came with a bigger force but their layout didn't change. I don't think they're war-scale. Joking aside, there's nothing making HTTPS inherently less secure than any other secure channel out there, right? (disclaimer: I'm a web developer)