5 ms·
How long will they hold in case of an ally betrayal? In the unlikely event of having crazy Islamist dictator with imperial ambitions as the God Emperor of Turke
by venomsnake 10y ago
How long will they hold in case of an ally betrayal? In the unlikely event of having crazy Islamist dictator with imperial ambitions as the God Emperor of Turkey?
- dorfsmay 10y agoAren't most/all airplanes, missiles, etc... operated by the Turkish military from the U.S.? Doesn't the U.S. have the capability to disable them remotely?
- avar 10y agoNo, the US doesn't export its armaments with any sort of remote disabling functionality, who would buy arms like that?
- cloakandswagger 10y agoActually it should be a simple as expiring whatever API key the jets use to communicate back to the US-based control servers. So when it POSTs to a StartEngine endpoint or whatever, it wouldn't start.
- dsfyu404ed 10y agoYou're joking, right?
- goodplay 10y agoLol. No government would buy unreliable weapons.
- jsprogrammer 10y agoNo government could guarantee the reliability of purchased weapons. It is already known and been demonstrated that sabotaged arms will be bought.
- DonHopkins 10y agoWhat if they came with an Enhanced PROMIS Contract that guaranteed their reliability and lack of back doors and trojan horses? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inslaw https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inslaw
- michaelmrose 10y agoIf web developers ran wars the world would be a safer place.
- patates 10y agoApart from war machines communicating through HTTP, I can't help but giggle to the thought of such a dialog: - I repeat, the enemy seems to be not responsive. - What, you already killed them? - No we came with a bigger force but their layout didn't change. I don't think they're war-scale. Joking aside, there's nothing making HTTPS inherently less secure than any other secure channel out there, right? (disclaimer: I'm a web developer)
- sargun 10y agoYes it does. The US nuclear weapons have PALs, and although they're not remote disabling functions, they require special codes, which are not given to the host country for arming them.
- conjectures 10y agoAfter WWII we Brits sold cracked Engima machines internationally. You need to assume a foreign power would be willing to try and sell you equipment with backdoors. If they reasonably believed you wouldn't be able to spot them, or change actions if you did.
- dorfsmay 10y agoI remember this in the news, and again during the first Irak war (the stories were that the U.S. were asking France for the "code"), hence my question: http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/11152/can-exocet-missiles-be-remotely-disabled-with-secret-codes http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/11152/can-exocet...
- vikiomega9 10y agoAs purchased supplies? That would be disasterous for the industry, no?
- venomsnake 10y agoWith current cad/cam systems I think it is possible to design a not bad Katusha analog in a weekend. And produce a couple in the next week. 20-30 of those build in secret could deliver a nasty first blow.
- cm3 10y agoI'd have to look it up online, but while they used to import jet fighters from the US, Turkey builds similar F?? fighters and also drones like the Heron and other tools. But as a NATO member, I don't think they'd have a problem getting gear from third parties.