3 ms·
126 times an IBM programmer. Which I'm not going to assume is or was a normal programmer.
by njharman 10y ago
126 times an IBM programmer. Which I'm not going to assume is or was a normal programmer.
- Roboprog 10y agoI don't know. I suspect it would be a pretty safe bet that an IBM programmer would be within a standard deviation of mean productivity output: any less, and they would be culled; any more, and they would leave. +/- 1 sigma covers 2/3 of the population or so, right?