3 ms·
The very second sentence of the article answers your question: This is not a library, but rather a demonstration that it's possible (and preferable) to use Rea
by the_duke 10y ago
The very second sentence of the article answers your question:
This is not a library, but rather a demonstration that it's possible (and preferable) to use React instead of the core of d3.
- guylepage3 10y agoYes. So then the title is very misleading and should not be called D4.js.
- ctvo 10y agoDid the title get changed? Both on this post and the article, there's nowhere that it says it's D4.js.