4 ms·
Very cool.. My only question is.. Is this "D4.js" a full feature replacement for D3.js? Could be a bit misleading. Might want to have a new name for it? Thought
by guylepage3 10y ago
Very cool.. My only question is.. Is this "D4.js" a full feature replacement for D3.js? Could be a bit misleading. Might want to have a new name for it? Thoughts?
- the_duke 10y agoThe very second sentence of the article answers your question: This is not a library, but rather a demonstration that it's possible (and preferable) to use React instead of the core of d3.
- guylepage3 10y agoYes. So then the title is very misleading and should not be called D4.js.
- ctvo 10y agoDid the title get changed? Both on this post and the article, there's nowhere that it says it's D4.js.
- adamwong246 10y agoI've used the d4 pattern, but I've referred to it as d3act, as in "dee-three-act".