5 ms·
If the West would have bombed Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan and would have taken their oil we might be better off today. Saudia Arabia is notorious for s
by DominikR 10y ago
If the West would have bombed Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan and would have taken their oil we might be better off today.
Saudia Arabia is notorious for sponsoring mosques here in the EU that only ever seem to produce Salafi radicals and Jihadists which is in contrast to other Muslim communities that seem to have less of that problem.
Some countries in the EU already banned this influence from Saudi Arabia as it is widely considered as harmful to our societies.
But there are also some Muslim countries that did the same as they also consider their ideology as aggressive and inherently dangerous. (some of the Central Asian Muslim countries)
- Eutow 10y ago>If the West would have bombed Saudi Arabia instead of Afghanistan and would have taken their oil we might be better off today. We never learn, do we?
- DominikR 10y agoWhat would you propose? Leaving a country alone that backstabs us and incites fanatics to attack us while pretending to be our friend? Just look at what resources they have and what they potentially could do with it if they openly declared that the West is their enemy. I'm quite sure that no one will allow Saudi Arabia to use its resources against the West. If they do we'll take all they have away from them. By the way: It is absolutely legitimate to retaliate with force when you are under attack by another nation.
- y04nn 10y agoThe problem is if you attack Saudi Arabia, most if not all Arab countries will be on the side of SA, which would start a major conflict.