4 ms·
Nope - we thought that wasn't quite needed since they were being set up as a public service, not a monetization platform. We need a project like the Linux kern
by swsieber 10y ago
Nope - we thought that wasn't quite needed since they were being set up as a public service, not a monetization platform.
We need a project like the Linux kernel, except for a good browser.
- kevinjcliao 10y agohttps://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/ https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/
- swsieber 10y agoI don't consider this a good rebuttal - Firefox has done stuff like pocket (not monetary but invasive) and search engine deals (monetary). Though it is pretty close.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- drdre2001 10y agoDon't we have a couple of "Linux" like browsers already? Like Konqueror? Or are those not good enough?
- swsieber 10y agoNope - they aren't good enough. It's not easy to install. What I would love in a browser: * An organization set up to oversee it that does not need to care about money (pipe dream part here). * Easy to install. * Standards compliant. * Open source. All in all, Firefox is the closest (imo). What rubs me wrong about chrome is that originally it was to be monetized - at least I don't remember such.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]