3 ms·
Well, first of all I'll take offense to The Sith were not a people. Who gave you the right to decide who is people and who is vermin (or whatever you mean by t
by yumraj 17y ago
Well, first of all I'll take offense to The Sith were not a people.
Who gave you the right to decide who is people and who is vermin (or whatever you mean by that statement).
Secondly, who gives you the right to decide who lives and who dies. That is a very slippery slope and similar arguments have been used since as long as humans have been on this planet to prosecute and terminate whoever didn't agree with the majority.
Edit: According to some replies below I seem to have misunderstood the above objection as the claim is that Sith were not "a people" as in were not a group/race/etc. but more like 1-2 persons who were terminated. If that is the case, I formally withdraw my above objection, else it still stands.
- tome 17y ago"a people", not "people". There's an important difference!
- benologist 17y agoPretty sure I remember reading or seeing that there's only ever two Sith at any given time.... that's not even mass-murder let alone genocide?
- rev087 17y agoAs chops pointed out, that was only true during the Rule of Two. Before that, there was the Sith Empire.
- astine 17y agobrazzy is using definition 3: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/people http://www.thefreedictionary.com/people