2 ms·
> they couldn't find sufficient intent that she intended to violate the law This is the problem. It's not their job to find intent but that a crime had been co
by AckSyn 10y ago
> they couldn't find sufficient intent that she intended to violate the law
This is the problem. It's not their job to find intent but that a crime had been committed and she should have been prosecuted. There are literally THOUSANDS of examples where someone hadn't intended to commit a crime and were punished regardless of that citing the often quoted "ignorance of the law is no excuse".
Hillary knew the law. She should have known better being in her position but she chose to circumvent the rules (for a number of reasons) and as a result the law was broken.
Her escape from prosecution is nothing more than a blatant public travesty of justice.
- chrisbennet 10y ago"should have known better"? C'mon, it's not like she's a lawyer or anything...oh wait.
- argonaut 10y agoBreaking the law requires intent or gross negligence, and the FBI said there was no evidence of either (gross negligence being a higher standard than "extreme carelessness").