4 ms·
People say Windows' Powershell using some sort of objects rather than a text stream is good. For me I want better control over how my shell records and stores
by J_Darnley 10y ago
People say Windows' Powershell using some sort of objects rather than a text stream is good.
For me I want better control over how my shell records and stores history. I want it to record more and probably not in a flat text file. I don't want it to write commands that fail to disk but I do want them in my history so I can correct my typo and run again.
I'd like lines to be rewrapped if I change terminal dimensions. I'd like more automatic pagination (rather than forgetting to use less and nuking your scrollback). I think is an issue with mintty/putty but I'd like its command history to be printed correctly after changing the terminal width.
Pet hates: terminal bells that I didn't explicitly ask for; middle click paste; the obscure terminfo file that sometimes controls the features a program uses.
- skykooler 10y agoPowershell is like the Java of shells: object-oriented, but needlessly verbose.
- ctolkien 10y agoEh, I like the Powershell angle here. By default everything is named in lengthy, self explaining names, but there's shorthand aliases for everything. In reality, no one is using `get-childitem` instead of `ls` or `dir` (both of which are simply aliases for `get-childitem`).