2 ms·
Yea i'd fully expect something like PAE to be more useful and common. Even if something is using more than 16EB of ram, i can't imagine it'll be a single proce
by simcop2387 10y ago
Yea i'd fully expect something like PAE to be more useful and common. Even if something is using more than 16EB of ram, i can't imagine it'll be a single process and instead it'll be larger distributed system instead, leaving each process smaller than that. Just filling up 16 EB of ram right now would take:
< simcop2387> farnsworth: eta[16 EiB, 19200 MiB/s] - #now# -> "years"
< farnsworth> simcop2387: 2177.63532452879 years
based on marketing info on DDR4. So at the very least it's going to take a while before we even have to worry about a max of 16EiB in address space.