3 ms·
What's annoying for me that's for other people (non-asylum, non-EU) the system is very bureaucratic and usually not so supportive, for example for someone from
by dmytroi 10y ago
What's annoying for me that's for other people (non-asylum, non-EU) the system is very bureaucratic and usually not so supportive, for example for someone from post-soviet country it might take up to a year to get a working permit in Sweden. Even if you apply for EU blue card it doesn't help much. But for asylum applications there is a "fast track" with all support possible, sure some part of them are fleeing from war, but some (or even probably most) of them are just economic asylum seekers, just check last statistic from Sweden [1].
It might be safe to assume that economic asylum seekers are looking for better life, which is fair and reasonable, but in this case the system is broken : why economic asylum seekers should get easier/faster/priority process over workers from non-EU countries, or why workers from non-EU countries should even bother with immigration process if they can just apply for asylum and be done with it?
- [1] http://www.migrationsverket.se/Om-Migrationsverket/Statistik/Asylsokande---de-storsta-landerna.html http://www.migrationsverket.se/Om-Migrationsverket/Statistik...
- TazeTSchnitzel 10y ago> why economic asylum seekers should get easier/faster/priority process over workers from non-EU countrie What makes you think they do? The UK locks many asylum seekers in immigration detention centres.