3 ms·
There is a legal definition of child pornography: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256 Did his work
by cft 10y ago
There is a legal definition of child pornography:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256
Did his work fit this definition? I doubt it, because he would have been in jail by now, given that he never concealed his name. Also Google is notorious for heavy handed treatment of smaller AdSense publishers, which makes me doubly sceptical.
http://www.webpronews.com/another-publisher-goes-after-google-for-unpaid-adsense-earnings-2015-01/ http://www.webpronews.com/another-publisher-goes-after-googl...
- Pica_soO 10y agoWho cares anyway, algorithmically full time surveillance of the public basically castrates pedophiles, limiting them to fiction. So the usual will happen, public shaming of the "artist" into some pseudo-religious organization, where he/she/it can be forced by the "believers" to uphold some the marriage/basic-income-for-beauty Contract. Another horrific social machine from the past. Could we at least pressure potentially creative persons into something socially useful? He/She/It who makes the biggest scientific contribution of a group of three, gets a good life and "surveilanced" freedom, the median gets publicly outed and "surveilanced" freedom, the least contributing goes to some prison. Repeat every year.