3 ms·
When I got to Harvard, probably the best Putnam/puzzle types of solvers there (among the students) were Don Coppersmith and Angelos Tsiromokos. Don went on to d
by CurtMonash 10y ago
When I got to Harvard, probably the best Putnam/puzzle types of solvers there (among the students) were Don Coppersmith and Angelos Tsiromokos. Don went on to do very important work in cryptology. Angelos went on to leave mathematics; his next gig was as a translator for the common market. (He was probably better in word games/puzzles -- Scrabble, crosswords, and so on -- in English than I was, even though it was his third language.)
Ofer Gabber and Ron (Ran) donagi also did very well on a semi-formal Putnam, and did so at very young ages. They went on to decent math careers.
I also took the Putnam at very young ages, but never cracked the top 100. I went on to leave mathematics.
Nat Kuhn was perhaps the best of the undergrads then. He went on to be a psychiatrist.
Andy Gleason was perhaps the best at that kind of thing among the faculty. Wonderfully nice guy, and my de jure thesis advisor, which was a bit awkward because he never got a PhD himself and didn't quite understand my stresses; I didn't realize the no-PhD part until after the fact, when I saw his resume in connection with his election as president of the American Mathematical Society.
- tamana 10y agoElder Harvard math professors who have PhDs don't really empathize either, because they are in the very high end of the talent spectrum, and they came up in the time when massive breakthroughs were told for picking.