Well, yes - you make an outrageous comment, I might make an outrageous reply. Also yes, the Dublin Agreement is the current law. That does not make it just. I

Well, yes - you make an outrageous comment, I might make an outrageous reply. Also yes, the Dublin Agreement is the current law. That does not make it just. I hold with a minority (alas) party of the country I live in - strike down that unjust law and, yes, require all EU and/or Schengen countries to share the effort of providing asylum. Including Monaco, which seems to be doing a good job of it already. If you want to defend that unjust law, then there's another solution - promote more legal ways to enter the EU, rather than force them through land and dangerous ocean routes, and overloading the border countries. Get rid of carrier liability and let asylum seekers hop a plane into whichever country they want. As it stands, airlines don't want to bear the penalty for transporting someone who might not get refugee status. Charter boats so places which are willing to accept refugees (for example, in Spain, https://www.yahoo.com/news/barcelona-waits-refugees-arent-coming-144943837.html?ref=gs https://www.yahoo.com/news/barcelona-waits-refugees-arent-co... ) don't end up with only a trickle. Quoting from that last link, "human rights are above European legislation".