3 ms·
I had a Swiss professor on my committee who would halt any discussion of evolutionary process if someone hinted at 'purpose' or 'intention'. He would pop up an
by theophrastus 10y ago
I had a Swiss professor on my committee who would halt any discussion of evolutionary process if someone hinted at 'purpose' or 'intention'. He would pop up and shout in a thick Swiss accent "noO!dis iz da fallacy uv teleology!"[1] He would never be assuaged with attempts to point out that such references are merely short-hands for longer, more precise, statements. But he consistently held the best post-presentation parties.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleology
- manachar 10y agoI understand the insistence. Here in the US, people think "It's just a theory" is a legitimate refutation of evolution. Shorthand terms can shape the debate in wasteful ways. By always ensuring you use the correct terms and thinking with evolution it helps shape the debate in more useful ways.