3 ms·
A year ago I would've agreed with you, but lldb seems just as solid these days. I use lldb just about every day in all sorts of oddball, convoluted debugging sc
by mwfunk 10y ago
A year ago I would've agreed with you, but lldb seems just as solid these days. I use lldb just about every day in all sorts of oddball, convoluted debugging scenarios, and I just haven't been hitting the issues I used to with it.
It's not perfect- there are still rare situations in which it's not using the right symbols, but at least that I can usually fix that with a 'target symbols add'. Otherwise it's because the thing I'm trying to debug is sandboxed or otherwise protected, which is almost always going to be a hassle, and requires workarounds outside of the debugger. Raw lldb is a lot better than it used to be though.
- slrz 10y agoAre you on OS X? LLDB might work a bit better there than on other platforms.