3 ms·
Well, what you expect from people who happen to turn around in their (unverifiable) models 180 degrees (Amazon jungle net produces oxygen! No, it's a net consum
by dozzie 10y ago
Well, what you expect from people who happen to turn around in their
(unverifiable) models 180 degrees (Amazon jungle net produces oxygen! No, it's
a net consumer!) and who routinely produce models that use some
physical value (heat capacity in greenhosue effect), but fail to account for
major substances influencing the value (water concentration in atmosphere)?
- jackmott 10y agoI'm not an expert on the history of opinions on amazon oxygen, but >but fail to account for major substances influencing the value (water concentration in atmosphere)? is absolutely false.
- dozzie 10y agoOK. Now show me any study that accounts that the water in the atmosphere (0.4% on global level, after Wikipedia, not 1% on the sea level) has ten times higher concentration than methane (0.00018%) and CO2 (0.039%) combined, and almost twice as big heat capacity (75 J/(mol * K)) as each of those (36 J/(mol * K) for methane, 37 J/(mol * K) for CO2). To sum up, heat capacity of atmospheric water being twenty times bigger than CO2 and CH4.