I appreciate the elaboration but don't think you've infact refuted anything I said. I originally put "user-mode executable" but edited it to "normal executable

I appreciate the elaboration but don't think you've infact refuted anything I said. I originally put "user-mode executable" but edited it to "normal executable" to be more understandable. I don't think it would be a stretch to call space-separated opaque values a language. A very simple one, mind. My answer was directed at someone dipping their toe in who explicitly mentionined that they wanted to make a bash-esque (i.e. non-trivial language) shell.