Oh yeah they only kill over 30,000 people a year needlessly. Those lives don't matter I guess. Licensure doesn't stop drunk drivers and cost cutting isn't nearl

Oh yeah they only kill over 30,000 people a year needlessly. Those lives don't matter I guess. Licensure doesn't stop drunk drivers and cost cutting isn't nearly a good enough incentive. Plus if you're lowering the number of cars on the road that suggests a certain level of centralization for the purposes of routing optimization. At that point, why not? Is your individual agency worth multiple other peoples' lives? You seem to be privileging fate over human life. And I'm not saying your agency isn't worth other peoples' lives, but the argument that this doesn't matter because it would be rare is silly. It's still a decision that will have to be made and it's an interesting question nonetheless.