4 ms·
Did I read this right that http1 was with cdn A (unnamed?) and http2 was with cdn B (cloudflare)? If so, you really can't draw any conclusions about the protoc
by cagenut 10y ago
Did I read this right that http1 was with cdn A (unnamed?) and http2 was with cdn B (cloudflare)?
If so, you really can't draw any conclusions about the protocol difference when the pop locations, network designs, hardware and software configurations could easily have made the kinds of differences you're seeing.
- xzyfer 10y agoYou read it correct. By not moving our render blocking assets like CSS, JS and fonts over to the http/2 we rule out performance changes due to improvements to head of line block. Our images were always on a separate hostname so the DNS lookup over is the same. We also did some initial benchmarking and found the new CDN to be more efficient than the old one.