4 ms·
Thanks for the info, see my response below.
by SapphireSun 10y ago
Thanks for the info, see my response below.
- are595 10y agoI'd also consider WebP. FLIF is great but compression time is much slower than WebP for similar results.
- manigandham 10y agoStore it as FLIF then dynamically serve up whatever is needed for the web interface...
- SapphireSun 10y agoWe're storing them as RAWs for our backups, but it's cheaper and faster to store them compressed and transmit them without a transformation step. I'll keep FLIF in mind, but it looks kind of unstable reading the website?
- are595 10y agoYes, the FLIF format is still being fully fleshed out. I would actually give WebP a shot instead of JPG. It offers better compression and already has native implementations in Chrome and on Android.