> I also wonder why there are still people who want to argue that there was literally no genuine news value in a media outlet outing a powerful billionaire who

> I also wonder why there are still people who want to argue that there was literally no genuine news value in a media outlet outing a powerful billionaire who would personally and financially support a party that would put this on their platform, but I guess that's another story. Is it normal to reverse causality to make an argument?