3 ms·
It seems like access to data on US soil is a competitive dis-advantage for American companies.
by randomgyatwork 10y ago
It seems like access to data on US soil is a competitive dis-advantage for American companies.
- marcoperaza 10y agoOr perhaps an advantage. Data stored on US soil is subject to more legal protections. Data stored in other countries is fair game for American intelligence agencies, the most sophisticated in the world by far, to hack and steal. This case was just about whether the US government could compel Microsoft to hand it over with a warrant.
- SEJeff 10y agoLegal protections like what, FISA court orders? http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/fisa-court-nsa-spying-opinion-reject-request http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/06/fisa-court-nsa-spyin...
- mhurron 10y agoIntelligence agencies have no issue breaking the law, so no, keeping data in the US does not keep it safe from the NSA/CIA et al. This was about Law enforcement, they do need warrants to get and use the data obtained. Data in the US would only need a domestic warrant, which is never going to be hard to obtain. Microsoft was arguing that data in Ireland was out of the domain of US domestic warrents, and the judge agreed. Your data is safer from the US when it is outside the US. At least law enforcement doesn't have carte blanche access to it.
- rosser 10y agoRight, because No Such Agency has thus far demonstrated such careful regard for whether the packets it's sniffing are foreign or domestic. My data would totally be safest from my own government within its borders, where things like FISA and NSLs work.