3 ms·
But it's a more open platform than the alternatives, with live posting there are practically no gatekeepers, and it's hard take things back - cell phone videos
by ianbicking 10y ago
But it's a more open platform than the alternatives, with live posting there are practically no gatekeepers, and it's hard take things back - cell phone videos that aren't published are much more likely to be suppressed, or have their release delayed reducing the sense of public urgency. A few ads on the screen don't change the impact.
- herbst 10y agoI too think that Twitter would fit this niche perfectly with their live stream environment that also works as expected with higher loads and the way that nobody gets forced to register just to consume. I also don't see how news work where those who post the most (usually those with the weakest quality) are ranked better than anyone else. Their current platform/algo is simply not suiteable for such things. I don't see how Facebook provides any benefit other than live streaming, what is not exactly rocket science.