4 ms·
Here's an example of where CSS starts to become a bit more expensive: http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/css-fps/nojs/ http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/css-fps/n
by Retr0spectrum 10y ago
Here's an example of where CSS starts to become a bit more expensive:
http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/css-fps/nojs/ http://www.keithclark.co.uk/labs/css-fps/nojs/
Edit: The site seems to be overloaded. Here's an archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160702222211/http://keithclark.co.uk/labs/css-fps/nojs/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160702222211/http://keithclark...
- Eupolemos 10y agoThat was cool. For me, it doesn't run well on FF, but neatly in Chrome. Huge difference.
- Asmod4n 10y agoSafari has lower than 1% CPU Usage when running it.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- yAnonymous 10y agoImpressive.
- Rotten194 10y agoIt ran pretty well in Chrome Beta on my phone (~30fps?) for 10 seconds until the browser crashed.
- runeks 10y agoBeautiful! Runs exceptionally smooth using Chrome on an iPad Air 2. I have no doubt the GPU is doing most of the work. Less smooth on the same device using Safari.