> It's not about balance, it's about you willing to make guesses regarding the bad things Tesla has done, and not make guesses about the potential good things.

> It's not about balance, it's about you willing to make guesses regarding the bad things Tesla has done, and not make guesses about the potential good things. You're being pedantic. I can wager guesses about good things too. They're just not pertinent to the focus of this article. Constructive criticism, for me, is a positive thing. > You said the equivalent of, "I'm voting for X because of my speculation about Y but I refuse to speculate about Z as it does not fit my current argument." I gave some raw analysis of the statistics drawn, further here [1], and all you can do is complain that I am somehow voting against Tesla. I never said any such thing. I said we should demand more transparency from them about accident data. I made some further speculation about Tesla's likelihood to do this on their own because it supports the argument that we should be part of this conversation. To expand on that, I think we should ask this of all companies that enable driver-assist. Currently, California requires monthly reports on accidents involving fully autonomous vehicles. I think it makes sense to do that for every car [2]. If you think Tesla and other companies will become more transparent and you don't feel the need to do anything, great, that's your prerogative. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12087603 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12087603 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12084226 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12084226