Hi, well thanks for listening :) I'll take a little look at the Google Group tomorrow and would like to give some feedback! I think the project is fantastic.

Hi, well thanks for listening :) I'll take a little look at the Google Group tomorrow and would like to give some feedback! I think the project is fantastic. I've got a couple of little follow-up comments on accessibility... One important thing to remember about visually impaired users is that they almost always have their base font size in their browser set high already, or are using a magnifier. So 150% of an already large font becomes an unusably ginormous font. While the intention is definitely good, it can have the opposite effect (I speak from experience working with both technical and non-technical family members who are partially sighted). A base size of 14-16px (depending on font), increasing to 1.5em or 2em for headers works really well, and doesn't overcompensate when visually impaired users have their own font magnifying solutions in place (as they most often do because they're needed for the vast majority of websites). And in terms of the max width, I'd definitely take it down from 1200px. Long lines are harder to read [0 (also a really good example of readable width)]. Playing with the site in Chrome dev tools, "max-width: 54em;" works really well. It stops the right-aligned/floated elements being across a wide chasm from the left-aligned elements, and it keeps line lengths at a really readable limit. And by using ems instead of pixels, if visually impaired users have a higher base font size (which doesn't scale non-text elements with sizes in pixels), it won't distort the page layout. [0] http://baymard.com/blog/line-length-readability http://baymard.com/blog/line-length-readability