You mean the temporary S-Expression syntax? Because that's not how the final version will look. https://youtu.be/RByPdCN1RQ4?t=1714 https://youtu.be/RByPdCN1R

You mean the temporary S-Expression syntax? Because that's not how the final version will look. https://youtu.be/RByPdCN1RQ4?t=1714 https://youtu.be/RByPdCN1RQ4?t=1714 And from their FAQ: >Will WebAssembly support View Source on the Web? >a specific goal of the text format is to allow developers to write WebAssembly modules by hand for testing, experimenting, optimizing, learning and teaching purposes. In fact, by dropping all the coercions required by asm.js validation, the WebAssembly text format should be much more natural to read and write than asm.js. https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#will-webassembly-support-view-source-on-the-web https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md#wil... Now I didn't mean to come off as snippy and for that I do apologize, but I find it frustrating when people attack a project without understanding what it is they're criticizing. If you had asked "Does this pose a threat to the open web?", I think this would have been a much more productive exchange.