4 ms·

> So whys is parallel construction a bad thing? Because the first half of parallel construction, the illegal thing, is ... well, illegal.

• johncolanduoni 10y ago
  I think the OP's point was that you can argue against parallel construction even more effectively if you can demonstrate a case where the hidden side of the parallel construction isn't even illegal can already be problematic, you have a stronger argument against it. Either that or they're really pro-ruined lives?
  • a3n 10y ago
    > a case where the hidden side of the parallel construction isn't even illegal Agreed. In that case they're misleading the court and the defense. Which is probably, you know, illegal. :)
  • themartorana 10y ago
    I don't think you have to be "pro" ruined lives to be apathetic towards individuals whose lives were ruined.