3 ms·
> So, we're roughly in the same line of business only the customer relationships are reversed (10% PE, 90% VC). Cool, let's merge and take over everything then
by mbesto 10y ago
> So, we're roughly in the same line of business only the customer relationships are reversed (10% PE, 90% VC).
Cool, let's merge and take over everything then :)
> (2) If you're a VC, and especially an early stage one, then no, due diligence isn't necessary.
Sorry, I shouldn't have been so blanket with that statement (and you could probably tell, I'm a proponent of doing diligence regardless). If you're an angel investor and doing $10-25k deals then I would comfortably say it might be a waste of time, but if you're doing $1M seed deals, I definitely agree with your viewpoint.
> All that experience counts for something and even if the tech changes the lessons learned remain.
I don't disagree. My point here rather is that many people (i.e. entrepreneurs) see VCs as these more-than-mortal tech gods, which in reality, they are probably more fallible then you and I.
- jacquesm 10y ago> Cool, let's merge and take over everything then :) Deal. > My point here rather is that many people (i.e. entrepreneurs) see VCs as these more-than-mortal tech gods, which in reality, they are probably more fallible then you and I. Oh, that I'll happily agree with. They are - as a rule - more banker or record label than tech gods and they're certainly not more than mortal. All human failings present and accounted for.