4 ms·
Either I am reading this wrong or something is not right here. Buffered: windows = 0.006 linux = 0.03 80% Win for windows? But where do those numbers come f
by justinsaccount 10y ago
Either I am reading this wrong or something is not right here.
Buffered:
windows = 0.006
linux = 0.03
80% Win for windows?
But where do those numbers come from?
The time in ms for linux was 522, the time for windows was 410. That's not an 80% win.
where does the "Write cost" number come from?
In general for the other numbers I don't think they are comparing the same things. I don't think it is a coincidence that the two systems had write times of both about 10s and 20s for the different tests. Where linux took 20s and windows took 10s I'd bet that they were comparing different behaviors.
- zebracanevra 10y agoI believe write cost is ms/write 0.006 write cost = 410ms 0.03 write cost = 1966ms
- justinsaccount 10y agoI figured that is what it was, the raw data doesn't match up with the results in the table.
- danbruc 10y agoTime is the total running time for 64k writes, write cost is for a single write, so just dividing time by 65536 gives the write cost. This is correct for all listed tests on Linux and Windows except two, the two buffered tests on Linux. I am not sure what went wrong, both write cost values are about 3.75 times to high assuming the total time is correct.