>I argued for both. I argued for a change in the financial system, and as I elaborated on how I could see this come to pass But see, the education comes first.

>I argued for both. I argued for a change in the financial system, and as I elaborated on how I could see this come to pass But see, the education comes first. You don't promise people sunshine and rainbows and then give them a condition. They will not hear about the condition. They heard about the prize and all they hear is the prize. And this is how so many tin-foil hatters are bread, convinced of lizard people puppeteering the whole planet in their spare time. Bullshit like Zeigeist. Concatenations with half the facts missing. Straight to the conclusions. This is the route you take when you want to trick people, not when you want to educate them! And no, I actually don't see the problem with income inequality. People in general are living better. I don't particularly care that Mark Zuckerberg has a million times more money then me. I will be able to send to send my son to the same university as his. So who cares and why? Even if there are problems, you are curing a cold with surgery. it's all about risk/reward. And your ratio sucks. Big time.