4 ms·
> I hate to play Devil's advocate here, but a traditional car on cruise control will absolutely become a lethal missile if its driver has a stroke. You're talk
by studentrob 10y ago
> I hate to play Devil's advocate here, but a traditional car on cruise control will absolutely become a lethal missile if its driver has a stroke.
You're talking worst case scenario. This is a case where the driver was alive and chose to ignore warnings.
> I don't think automation makes that particular use case more dangerous.
It's more dangerous when the autopilot driver can easily misuse the system. Add a few requirements like hands on the wheel every few seconds before shut-off and you'll see this happen less frequently. Someone may still circumvent that measure. Nothing's perfect. There will be fewer people who abuse it.
- vkou 10y agoAutopilot absolutely should start slowing the car down if the driver takes his hands off the wheel for more then a few seconds. Anything else is reckless. I was, however, responding to the specific scenario of 'Driver has a stroke --> Self-driving car becomes an unguided missile' by pointing out that it the exact same scenario as 'Driver has a stroke --> Regular car with cruise control becomes an unguided missile.'