4 ms·
I disagree with the assertion that the UK has been an empire of any kind since roughly the end of World War II. I agree in part with the article's core assertio
by ivraatiems 10y ago
I disagree with the assertion that the UK has been an empire of any kind since roughly the end of World War II. I agree in part with the article's core assertion, that the UK's days as a major influence on the global political and financial stages are now over.
However, I think this has been a gradual process. I think it has to do less with an internal dissolution of British society's pillars (though I think that is happening), and more with a lack of understanding of just what kind of weight Britain has to throw around. Put simply: Britain is not as important as it thinks it is, and the EU is much more important than people think it is. Britain needs the EU more than the EU needs it.
That's not an easy thing to accept. Who among us wants to be told "you don't matter like you think you do?" Imagine an American's reaction to being told that.
But it's a lesson the UK needs to learn, and fast, if it's to keep its economy and quality of life.
- rodgerd 10y ago> I disagree with the assertion that the UK has been an empire of any kind since roughly the end of World War II. British troops were still hanging, shooting, and torturing people in Asia and African territories 15 years after World War II, all in order to maintain control over colonies.
- kingmanaz 10y agoGiven the present state of Africa since decolonization, Africans should in truth be praying for the return of the British justice which ( briefly ) enabled civilization to spring forth on the Dark Continent. A British managerial class and Anglo colonies would be a blessing for the average African.
- cholantesh 10y agoI see /pol/ has invaded HackerNews.